They’ve given up on even having a seat at the table. The MGTOW movement has adopted the other pillar of feminism as the center-piece of its philosophy-radical self-determinism. It’s basically the Benedict Option of the red pill movement-withdraw and do your own thing. It’s a part of the red pill movement made up of men who have decided that the deck is so stacked against males that they are going to check out from normal life, and in particular from relationships with women. MGTOW (rhymes with fig-chow) stands for Men Going Their Own Way.
Meanwhile, feminism grew up and got hormone therapy so there are no men or women anymore. Red Pillers and TERFers both got stuck on the playground slide, arguing about whether it’s boys or girls that rule and who drools. Neither group questions the idea that men and women should be completely equal, the only question is which group needs affirmative action.īut if there are no fundamental differences between men and women, then whether you are a man or woman makes no difference. Redpillers say men are now discriminated against by society. Second, who is being treated worse, men or women? TERF’s say women have it worse. First, who is worse, man or woman? In summary, one says men are abusive, the other says women are sluts. The argument between the TERF’s and the Redpillers can be boiled down to two questions. But they can’t work together, though they believe the same thing. Both acknowledge that men and women are different. The men have become mainstream Redpillers and the women have become trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs).
Old-school feminists can probably get on board with most of the men’s rights goals, but today, both mens rights activists and old-school feminists are vanishingly rare. If that’s not allowed, circumcision shouldn’t be allowed either. If men are going to be drafted, women ought to be as well. These are the Mens Rights Activists (MRA). The soft edge of the Red Pill movement is only concerned with egalitarianism. In reality it has accepted feminism’s underlying philosophies-egalitarianism and self-determinism. The problem with the red pill movement is that it only thinks it is opposed to feminism. Thus, men who have taken the red pill are rooting for the destruction of feminism to come sooner rather than later. Given that feminism is the current standard, red pill is, at least in theory, a rejection of feminism.
What binds them all together as “Red Pill” is their rejection of today’s standard understanding of sexuality and male-female relationships. Red Pill is a diverse movement, made up of various groups of men believing and acting very differently from one another. It’s easy to think that soon enough they will encompass everything. Growing, they touch more, destroying whatever they touch. Whether it will collapse before or after its final merger with its sister ideology, liberal wokeism, is less certain.
#Red pill men series#
(NOTE: This is part of a series titled, “ The state of our disunion.”)įeminism is untenable.
0 kommentar(er)
